Gun owners beware

Gun owners beware of charlatans who try to convince you the Second Amendment was only intended to protect the ability of the people to raise a militia, and private ownership of guns was never addressed by the 2nd Amendment.

These anti-rights con-artists who claim expertise on the origins of the 2nd Amendment, are trying to induce you into believing individuals have no Constitutional right to keep and bear arms for their self-defense.

Learn the facts from Stephen P. Halbrook, a distinguished authority on the 2nd Amendment. He has written many books on Americans Constitutional right to bear arms including the following: That Every Man Be Armed, considered the most thorough analysis of the legal history and original intent of the 2nd Amendment; Freedmen, The Fourteenth Amendment and the Right to Bear Arms, 1866-1876; and The Founders 2nd Amendment, origins of the right to bear arms. He provides documented evidence the 2nd Amendment protects the states right to maintain a Militia, and also an individual right to keep and bear arms without being affiliated with any state Militias.

Halbrook has argued and won three gun right cases before the Supreme Court. His fact and material on the 2nd Amendment was presented before the Supreme Court in Heller v. D.C. Case, where the court struck down D.C.’s ban on handguns as it violated an individual’s 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms for lawful use in the home for self-defense. In the McDonald v. Chicago decision, the Supreme Court ruled that an individual’s right to keep and bear arms in the home is incorporated and applicable to the states through the 14th Amendment’s Due Process clause.

Our 2nd Amendment unconditionally proclaims, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Even Alan Dershowitz, a lawyer, author, who voted for Hillary Clinton warned: Those foolish liberals who are trying to read the 2nd Amendment out of the Constitution by claiming it’s not an individual right, or that it’s too much of a safety hazard don’t see the danger in the big picture. They’re courting disaster by encouraging others to use the same means to eliminate portions of the Constitution that they don’t like.”

Remember, the main objective of radical progressives, Socialists and Marxists has always been people control over unarmed and vulnerable citizens.

William L. Emick


Submitted by Virtual Newsroom