The shutdown and the border openers

The government shutdown ended so the two sides could negotiate on border security. It’s nonsense, of course. Pelosi and Co. has made it abundantly clear before, during and since the shutdown: There will be no border wall funding, period, they said.

And while there was some border funding, with restrictions, in the compromise bill, they were mandated to take this extremist position because extremists control the Democratic Party today. They’re also emboldened to take this position because they know they can count on the media to give them the airtime they need. The media have always covered shutdowns in the same exact way. It is always the fault of conservatives hell-bent on national chaos, affording the elites to expand their wealth and power at the expense of the poor and downtrodden, etc., etc., etc.

Given this reality, GOP “moderates” head for the tall grass, egged on by consultants who are governed by their hunger for consultancy contracts.

They argue that shutdowns for any reason are an absolute fool’s errand for Republicans. The national “news” media will deliver a daily grind of GOP-caused mayhem, stories about lapsing security at airports; government employees going broke and attempting suicide, or having to sell their plasma or ration their insulin because President Trump was so obstinate. And never mind that by law, every single penny lost during a shutdown was paid to federal workers as soon as it’s over, making the shutdown a nice vacation for the suffering lot.

The professional consultants are right about the one-sided nature of shutdown coverage.

The latest Media Research Center study showed when it came time to assess blame for the shutdown, the network evening news shows blamed President Trump on 133 occasions and singled out the Democrats only 23 times. That’s a 6-to-1 disparity. But it was actually worse. A few of those 23 were questions put to the Democrats to solicit talking points as to why they shouldn’t be blamed! House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was fed a softball and disingenuously (big surprise) replied, “It has nothing to do with us.”

If you can believe it, a 6-to-1 tilt is an improvement over the last shutdown (over Obamacare), in 2013. In that shorter standoff, the networks blamed the Republicans 41 times and blamed then-President Obama zero times.

So, should Republicans have given in? The answer is yes — provided the desire is to remain an irrelevant minority excuse for a party of principles.

President Trump has defied that old paradigm of Republicans surrendering to the ironclad media-Democrat alliance. And why not? What exactly does he have to lose?

If you look at the routinely hypernegative nature of Trump’s TV coverage, the White House could argue that January and February weren’t different than any other period. The network stories on Trump were 93 percent negative in January, just a point higher than December’s rating. When you’re in the stratosphere, what’s a couple more feet of altitude?

Rather than running, Republicans should start fighting. They can do so by telling their side of the story. Through the conservative media, they can reach tens of millions on a daily basis. But what kind of story?

CNSNews.com reports that four women of color who were relentlessly celebrated by the press during the midterms, with adulation that continues to this day — Reps. Ayanna Pressley, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — wrote a “dear colleague” letter to those serving on the conference committee that is negotiating with the president. They insisted Congress cut funding for the Department of Homeland Security and deny federal money to border control.

The leftist women accuse DHS of abusing its power to “build desert camps to inhumanely house infants and to prosecute immigrants who are part of the fabric of our community.” They added that the border enforcers “have promulgated an agenda driven by hate — not strategy.”

The media will tell you it’s ridiculous for Trump to tweet that “radical Democrats” are taking over their party; that they are not interested in policing the border; that they want open borders; and that they are so radical they don’t want anyone to talk about MS-13 or other groups of violent criminal immigrants.

But the truth remains and confirms all these statements. This is why they hate conservative media outlets: They can’t win policy arguments by relentlessly demonizing the other side as inhumane racists.

In the last three months of 2018, how many illegals were apprehended when trying to sneak into the United States? The answer from the Border Patrol: 184,011.

Bozell is president of the Media Research Center.

COMMENTS