|
|
Hagel storiesJanuary 30, 2013Great choice of experts to pick to argue why Chuck Hagel should not be Defense Secretary.What makes these two people experts on the military or on our defense? Mr. Krauthammer did not serve in the U.... Showing 25 of 38 comments Show More Comments
Post a Comment |
|
Francine
I don't know if I agree with you Mr. Sever. I haven't decided yet. What I do know is that your brother Tom was one h ell of a pitcher. And so was future Hall of Famer, also from Montoursville, Mike Mussina!
1 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
CHayes
Great letter, the only word missing from it is "chickenhawks".
3 Agrees | 10 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
CHayes
I suppose the letter writers point is that certain people commenting Congressman Hagel's position on defense, is as odd as the way Fox "News" tracked down Dick Cheney over the weekend to ask him about gun control. Considering Dick Cheney once shot another man in the face, then got the guy to go on TV and essentially apologize for blocking his shot with his face.
2 Agrees | 11 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Josh84
Oh where to begin...
"I'm sure that every veteran will agree with Mr. Hagel that the military is too fat."
I(as a combat veteran of OIF/OEF, will not agree with this. As well as many others with which I have served. You would be better off not trying to serve as spokesman for all veterans.
LTE-"I'm betting he never served at all."
we have yet to see your DD214 sir.
LTE_"Mr. Krauthammer did not serve in the U.S. military as he was conveniently going to college in Canada"
The man was RAISED in Montreal, Quebec. how convenient, right. Once again, we have yet to see your DD214.
LTE-"I expect Mr. Hagel knows just how much we need B1 Bombers and 35,000 nuclear weapons to fight the Taliban."
The United States has 2,150 active warheads, but hey what are facts good for anyways, right?
11 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
SteelerFan
Hazy: "Great letter, the only word missing from it is "chickenhawks"." Also missing was a lot of truth as pointed out by Josh, but don't let a little truth get in the way. Also, the current White House doesn't have a lot of folks working there with military experience.
9 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
MrShaman
"Just who are we planning to fight when we spend more on weapons than all of the rest of the world combined?" - Al Sever
*
More-often-than-not, it's the American tax-payers...unless, of course, it's possible to maintain "adequate"-enough scare-tactics (coupled with questioning their "patriotism") to extort MORE "defense"-buck$ from them.
3 Agrees | 7 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
spike2
Hagel will get the post. The people who post here are always indicative of what will happen. If we are 3 to 1 against something or someone they or it will succeed. Like it or not, this area is out of touch with the broader national sentiment.
5 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
MrShaman
"Oh where to begin...
"I'm sure that every veteran will agree with Mr. Hagel that the military is too fat."
I(as a combat veteran of OIF/OEF, will not agree with this. As well as many others with which I have served. You would be better off not trying to serve as spokesman for all veterans." - Josh84
*
You're THAT heavily-inve$ted in our "defen$e-indu$try"????
2 Agrees | 9 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
philunderwood
Our military should be as strong and equipped as necessary to provide for the defense of the country, not for policing the world or nation building that has proven to be costly in terms of deaths and injuries, with results that are questionable at best. Whether Hagel is the person to accomplish this remains to be seen.
11 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
MrShaman
"Like it or not, this area is out of touch with the broader national sentiment." - spike2
*
...Specifically, those States ladened with defen$e-contractor$...who are MUCH-more concerned with their local-economy, than they are with the national-defense.
4 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
CMReeder
Here we go again.
4 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
CHayes
" Also, the current White House doesn't have a lot of folks working there with military experience."
So the right wing response is to oppose two appointees, with 5 Purple Hearts, 1 Bronze Star, and one Silver Star between them? I'm sure that makes perfect sense, somewhere, though I'm not sure where that would be.
0 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
Bobbie2
Spike "Like it or not, this area is out of touch with the broader national sentiment."
You're so correct Spike, we're just gonna have to work harder around here to produce more government thieves.
4 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
SteelerFan
I don't recall a lot of opposition to Kerry and I'm sure Hagel will make it. I'm not opposed to either one. Barry can pick his own poison.
1 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
msgjsheets
Military service by itself does not guarantee somebody is ready to be Secretary of Defense or Secretary of State but it is helpful. The nominee's record and his or her philosophy is and should be examined. That is the reason for Advise and Consent and three branches of government. It should never be assumed that somebody is qualified just because the President nominated them, no matter which party is in office.
4 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
msgjsheets
Is there fat that can be trimmed from the Defense budget? Yes. Is there fat that can be trimmed from the rest of the federal budget? Yes. We should be doing both, mindful that providing for the common defense is a primary tenet of the federal government. We must insure that we have the strongest, best trained and best equipped military in the world. If you truly support the troops, you cannot believe otherwise. They are alwasy the ones to suffer first and the most when budget cuts come to town.
4 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
msgjsheets
Is Shaman an annoying idiot? I think we all know the answer to that question.
8 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
JerryfromRI
@Josh84
What the source of your nuclear weapons statistics?
The Brookings institute says there are 10600. That at the peak there were 35000 and 70000 made in total since inception.
0 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
rmiller
Mr. Sever.....me thinks thou doth protest too much.
You certainly have your biases against otherwise conservative voices.
2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
USABorn
"Mr. Krauthammer did not serve in the U.S. military as he was conveniently going to college in Canada during the Vietnam conflict."
Krauthammer was RAISED in Montreal. He has been paralyzed and in a wheelchair since his first year at Harvard.
His contribution to the field of psychiatry is worth noting.
His contribution as a fighter for the rights of Americans and the U.S. Constitution is phenominal.
6 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
rmiller
USA,
Mr. Krauthammer" as you rightly point out is a brilliant man with much insight.
He has, from my understanding, a tube in his throat, which would account for his speaking with the raising of his chest with every breath.
Did Obama serve anytime in our services, outside of viewing them die on his watch?
4 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
CHayes
"Did Obama serve anytime in our services, outside of viewing them die on his watch?"
Regale us with stories of your time in the military auntie Chickenhawk.
0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
CHayes
"Krauthammer was RAISED in Montreal. He has been paralyzed and in a wheelchair since his first year at Harvard."
Krauthammer was born in NY City, and thus is an American citizen. In 1968, at the height of the Viet Nam war, he was 18 years old, and eligible for service in the US military.
He went to grad school at Harvard, which meant he had been ducking service for quite some time by staying in college.
An individual can drive from Montreal to Plattsburgh, VT in under an hour and a half, and Krauthammer COULD HAVE done this at any time after reaching the age of 18, to enlist. He CHOSE not to.
0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
CMReeder
Love how the right displays respect for those who serve over those who don't and can spit on anyone who did serve and is a member of the Democratic party or appointed to an office under a Democratic President. The right does not have respect for the military they only unabashedly use it.
1 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »
MrShaman
"It should never be assumed that somebody is qualified just because the President nominated them, no matter which party is in office." - msgjsheets
*
...And, what BETTER example than Flight-Instructor Rumsfeld??
1 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »