Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Newspaper contacts | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Pro-choice?

April 16, 2013

Pro-choice advocates maintain that a woman should have a choice when it comes to her reproduction and it’s her “right” to have someone else pay for it....

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(264)

CMReeder

Apr-16-13 12:15 AM

Another ridiculous letter.

6 Agrees | 20 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

WKnapp

Apr-16-13 12:23 AM

... followed by a really stupid comment by Reeder!

15 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

MBardo

Apr-16-13 12:42 AM

Not that I expect to get an answer from Chuck, but exactly what is ridiculous about this letter?

13 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

USABorn

Apr-16-13 1:14 AM

CMReeder - 12:15 AM

"Another ridiculous letter."

It's such a shame Reeder can NEVER make a comment that contributes to anything other than substantiation of his own stupidity.

17 Agrees | 6 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

MBardo

Apr-16-13 1:33 AM

USABorn, there was a time when I would not have agreed with your statement. A few years ago we had some pretty good debates, but he doesn't seem to have the ability anymore.

12 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

mikekerstetter

Apr-16-13 3:44 AM

I agree Mbardo. At one time Chuck could add solidly to debates. Sadly, now he's regressed to being nothing more than a flamer. What a shame.

13 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

mikekerstetter

Apr-16-13 3:47 AM

Phil, good point. And don't forget about the birth control they want us to pay for. I guess you could consider abortion birth control since that's what it's most often used for.

12 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Ritty77

Apr-16-13 5:29 AM

Good letter, Phil.

13 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

gavinf56

Apr-16-13 5:33 AM

Good letter Phil.

13 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

CarlHiller

Apr-16-13 5:48 AM

Phil - I'll add my good letter to! Short, sweet and to the point. Chuckie shows the empty rhetoric of a leftist once again. Nothing of substance, nothing of truth and absolutely nothing worthwhile to say.

11 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

gavinf56

Apr-16-13 5:53 AM

You guys can make fun of Chuck all you want, but understand he is a hero of the left on these boards.

6 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

VinceKnauff

Apr-16-13 6:09 AM

When Chuck can't debate the point (which is NEVER!!) he resorts to stupid name calling. I have called on Chuck to give detail to his opposition of various points and he never does.

14 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

ToTEXASfromPA

Apr-16-13 6:11 AM

Just a tax? Eh!

9 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

VinceKnauff

Apr-16-13 6:14 AM

Liberals only support "choice" when a person chooses the option they support. If one chooses the other option then Liberals aren't so supportive.

"Pro-choice" is just another example of their talent in naming something the opposite of what it really is. Other examples are "progressive" and "Affordable Care". If the media was the least bit interested in doing their jobs instead of carrying Democrats' water, more people might see the hypocrisy this way.

13 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Premier

Apr-16-13 6:27 AM

Carl: "Chuckie shows the empty rhetoric of a leftist once again. Nothing of substance, nothing of truth and absolutely nothing worthwhile to say."

Very true Carl but let's thank the Lord he's still able to string together small sentences however obtuse they may be.

6 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Tedeaux

Apr-16-13 7:01 AM

What about the rights of the unborn children that are being killed? More Americans babies are killed in one year than all of.the American military killed in all the wars that America has ever been in from 1776! What about their right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happyness?

10 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

rick424

Apr-16-13 7:43 AM

"You guys can make fun of Chuck all you want, but understand he is a hero of the left on these boards."

Say what you want, but I think the opposite. He certainly can get the right's panties in a bunch. All he said was "another ridiculous letter" and it was followed by a barrage of hate mail. Keep up the good work Mr Reeder, I find the entertainment priceless.

3 Agrees | 9 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

gavinf56

Apr-16-13 7:51 AM

So you are saying you are embarrassed by his postings Rick?

7 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

rmiller

Apr-16-13 7:54 AM

Proc-choice?

You raise a valid issue, Phil.

The "pro choice" advocates, which are "pro abortion" until they wanted to clean up the use of the word "abortion" was/is and will continue to be about the female vote. Sadly, millions of lives have been terminated to appease the political masses. And, we think we are a civilized society?

8 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

JohnZook

Apr-16-13 7:54 AM

More impeccable logic from the Right! Keep up the good work Phil and someday the light will shine through on these Lefties.

5 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Kelaine

Apr-16-13 7:54 AM

Let me throw a wrench into this discussion. I'm not talking the morality of abortion, just the economics.

If a woman's insurance does not cover the procedure, then she must pay cash for it. Federal Tax dollars are prohibited from funding abortion.

Poor women seeking an abortion many times must spend weeks raising the money for the procedure. Then sadly, by the time they have enough money for the procedure they are either past the legal date or still can't afford a reputable facility. Making abortions financially and legally harder to get, will not make abortions go away, but it will create a lot more Kermit Gosnells.

While Kermit Gosnell's facility was technically legal, it should not have been. There were several complaints filed over the years against Gosnell. PA Dept of Health dropped the ball on this one.

It's funny how all you men have so much to say about this, but in the reality of the abortion debate the "fathers" of these pregnancies are never anywhere to b

7 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

MrShaman

Apr-16-13 8:01 AM

"Pro-choice advocates maintain that a woman should have a choice when it comes to her reproduction and it's her "right" to have someone else pay for it." - Phil Underwood

*

That's what FAUX Noise & Porky Limbaugh say, huh??

4 Agrees | 10 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Josh84

Apr-16-13 8:03 AM

Kelaine Apr-16-13 7:54 AM*****"Poor women seeking an abortion many times must spend weeks raising the money for the procedure."

I guess they should have considered this when they made the decisions leading up to their situation.

How many bad decisions must "we" pay for. Ever think that perhaps personal responsibility be taken by others.

11 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

rick424

Apr-16-13 8:06 AM

Not at all Gavin. It is fun to watch the right defend itself with FAUX news logic. Just talked to my sister last night and it was unbelievable how far off the cliff she has gone. Even mentioned FAUX. My brother is the same, he is even bordering the survivalists mentality, really a shame it is happening, it is like they took a stupid pill and logic just took a leap out the window, but I still love them. Glad I found the light, just look at the right's comments on here any you tell me. Good comment Kelaine, very well thought out and factual.

2 Agrees | 9 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

MrShaman

Apr-16-13 8:09 AM

"Not that I expect to get an answer from Chuck, but exactly what is ridiculous about this letter?" - MBardo

*

Gee...let's see...you mean, BESIDES Phil describing this scenario as another o' those "pro-life absolutes"...with ZERO references to any actual/documented instances, where someone insisted it was their "right" to have someone-else pay for their abortion???

2 Agrees | 8 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 25 of 264 comments Show More Comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web