Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Newspaper contacts | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Wasteful spending takes away from Armed Forces needs

May 13, 2013

No nation on earth has an armored vehicle capable of standing up to the U.S. Abrams tank. On conventional battlefields, it is virtually unbeatable....

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(3)

MrShaman

May-16-13 1:04 PM

"How easy it is to see wasteful government spending out side our area. Can't remember seeing any editorials about government related projects or jobs in this area." - DavidBross

*

You make that sound like a bad-thing...that we don't rely (primarily) on wasteful military-spending to keep our economy's "head, above-water".

*

See:

Eisenhower's "Military-Industrial Complex" Speech Origins and Significance (YouTube)

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

DavidBross

May-13-13 2:01 PM

How easy it is to see wasteful government spending out side our area. Can't remember seeing any editorials about government related projects or jobs in this area.

0 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

MrShaman

May-13-13 5:54 AM

"Political spending for the military not only wastes taxpayers' dollars, but also diverts resources for more important armed service needs. U.S. Sens. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, and Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, would do an enormous service for the military by leading a move to kill the plan to waste $436 million on new tanks."

*

Uh-Oh!!! It appears the S-G is drifting into that "battleground" between "good" & "evil"...between REAL Americans & the lamestream-media!!!!

1 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 3 of 3 comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web