Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Newspaper contacts | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Faulty premise

June 23, 2013

Regarding the world's wealth redistribution via Climate Change: I simply refute the selective evidence submitted by one of your other commentators on the issue of global warming....

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(8)

CHayes

Jun-23-13 2:34 AM

"The most interesting statements to consider are from 1992 first Earth Climate Summit held in Rio de Jeniero, Brazil, where the organizer of that first-ever Earth Climate Summit admitted in his opening statement, that they would use the climate change agenda to redistribute the world's wealth."

Tick, tick, tick, tick;

RINNNNNGGGGGG

And the next Republican conspiracy theory hits the papers. How did these people get so broken? Did Bill Clinton do this to them?

5 Agrees | 11 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

CarlHiller

Jun-23-13 6:11 AM

"Tick, tick, tick, tick; RINNNNNGGGGGG" Hayes it is not conspiracy anymore. 11/14/2010, Ottmar Edenhofer co-chair of the UN IPCC working group III. "Climate policy has almost nothing to do anymore with environmental protection." The world climate summit in Cancun was actually an economic summit during which the distribution of the world’s resources were be negotiated. Edenhofer again, "First of all, developed countries have basically expropriated the atmosphere of the world community. But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole."

8 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

CarlHiller

Jun-23-13 6:14 AM

Here are some other world leaders statements - Opening remarks by Maurice Strong, organizer of the first U.N. Earth Climate Summit (1992) in Rio de Janeiro, revealed the real goal: “We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrialized civilization to collapse. Isn’t it our responsibility to bring this about?” HMMMMMM Former Senator Timothy Wirth (D-CO), representing the Clinton-Gore administration as U.S Undersecretary of State for global issues, addressing the same Rio Climate Summit audience, agreed: “We have got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.” (Wirth now heads the UN Foundation which lobbies for hundreds of billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to help underdeveloped countries fight climate change.) Double HMMMMMMMMM U.S. Senator Timothy Wirth (D-CO), “We have got to ride the global warming issue.

8 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

CarlHiller

Jun-23-13 6:16 AM

Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.” In 1988, former Canadian Minister of the Environment Christine Stewart told editors and reporters of the Calgary Herald: “No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.”

In 1996, former Soviet Union President Mikhail Gorbachev emphasized the importance of using climate alarmism to advance socialist Marxist objectives: “The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key to unlock the New World Order.”

HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM. Does sound kinda like a great many world leaders are involved in a conspiracy, doesn't it?

8 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

eriklatranyi

Jun-23-13 7:00 AM

Al Gore enriched himself by using the global warming snake oil.

Meanwhile, US companies suffer and move to places, like China, where such nonsense is not tolerated.

The transfer of wealth is underway, folks!

Meanwhile, liberals lament the loss of manufacturing, while continuing to push the policies that cause that loss.

Liberal hypocrisy, on display!

9 Agrees | 8 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

CMReeder

Jun-23-13 8:04 AM

That is you proof a statement from the first conference on global warming. You may read but you sure did not understand a thing that was printed.

5 Agrees | 10 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

CMReeder

Jun-23-13 8:05 AM

I also see that you are not concerned about the climate but about the money and redistribution aspects.

5 Agrees | 8 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

CarlHiller

Jun-24-13 6:03 AM

Actually, Mr. Reeder, I am quite concerned about the environment, that is why I am against gas drilling in such a willy-nilly fashion as PA has allowed. What I am most concerned about though is the use of environmental change and many of its lies to promote a redistribution of wealth to benefit a few elitists like Gore and Strong and others, rather than a creation of wealth to benefit all mankind. The elitists own words are proof positive that it is they who will benefit prosperously while the rest of the earth inhabitants will not. They will not give up their gas-guzzlers or big mansions while the rest of us will be forced to.

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 8 of 8 comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web