Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Newspaper contacts | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS

Short memories

June 26, 2013

You people have a short memory on the airport terminal need. The last expansion resulted in counter space for three air lines. Two have never been used....

« Back to Article

sort: oldest | newest




Jun-30-13 2:30 PM

I don't quite agree, although the airport is not utilized correctly. The present terminal was built before the after effects of 9/11 which resulted in new criteria for flight access. The check-in area is more than adequate but the area where people and carry-ons go through stringent inspections is quite insufficient. Whether this should require a new building depends upon the condition of the present structure. Updating or re-arranging existing space would be more cost effective, if the building is sound. Otherwise, a new terminal might be the better choice.

0 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jun-26-13 12:59 PM

Maybe Casey could get a big grant for an expansion and get the airport named after him. Seems to be popular with politicians.

1 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jun-26-13 8:26 AM

We don't need a new terminal. How's about using the money for a better access road?

2 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »


Jun-26-13 6:00 AM

Maybe they can just get rid of the airport altogether and build a couple hotels and chain restaurants on the site.

1 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 4 of 4 comments

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
Remember my email address.


I am looking for:
News, Blogs & Events Web