Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Newspaper contacts | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

Hit or miss

September 18, 2013

"Activists allege that unequal outcomes are proof of discrimination without any consideration for other factors that may explain the unequal outcome....

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(39)

USABorn

Sep-18-13 1:51 AM

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

It is absolutely unreal how people know Reeder's trashy LTE's in the first line or 2!

14 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

gavinf56

Sep-18-13 4:36 AM

So we get a letter that criticizes Phil and his letter but offers absolutely NOTHING to refute any of the points that were made in that letter.

17 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

gavinf56

Sep-18-13 4:41 AM

"Mr. Underwood misses in his letter and he doesn't prove any of his statements." - CMReeder

Just wondering if anybody seen any proof in the letter that refuted what Phil wrote other than just saying "Phil stated this and he is wrong."

17 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Garben78

Sep-18-13 4:49 AM

Wow I read the first line and realized it was chucky reeder

14 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Garben78

Sep-18-13 4:50 AM

Come on sungazette stop post everyone of this guys tantrums and rants he's a cry baby

15 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

VinceKnauff

Sep-18-13 5:27 AM

I have come to realize that Chuck's refusal to comment on his own letters is a major cop-out.

Know something Chuck? When your premise is that the other guy fails to provide any proof supporting his allegations, and then you deliberately avoid providing your own proof (because you don't know how) it SCREAMS hypocrisy.

Nobody believes you Chuck. Nobody respects your point of view (except for Shammy, whom I'm sure will give you the full MSNBC treatment) because you lack any credibility.

Observation and common sense supported the claims Phil made. Everybody knows women that fit his claims. You can't say the same for your opinions, Chuck. Please stop embarrassing yourself.

18 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Capricorn1

Sep-18-13 5:34 AM

Well I have to give Chuck credit for one thing, he doesn't mention "the right" one time in this letter. First time for everything.

19 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Premier

Sep-18-13 5:36 AM

MAY I HAVE YOUR ATTENSION PLEASE.

Anyone summiting a LTE should have MR. Charles Reeder proofread and edit your comments before publishing.

Thank you.

9 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

MrShaman

Sep-18-13 5:52 AM

"Observation and common sense supported the claims Phil made." - VinceKnauff

*

Ah, yes...more o' the "magic" of "absolutes"...where BELIEF trumps KNOWLEDGE.

4 Agrees | 19 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

CarlHiller

Sep-18-13 6:14 AM

The thing about this LTE is that Chuckie does the exact same thing he accuses Phil of. No proof for anything he rails against, just a trail of empty words for the lemmings will follow. If you are going to write a LTE accusing one party of providing no proof for their statements the least you could do would be to provide some to facts for your argument. You can never have equal outcomes without equality of conditions and conditions are never equal. Equality of outcomes deadens the motivation needed for people to achieve new inventions, intellectual discoveries, scientific breakthroughs and natural creative skills permitting further progress of a society. The goal of wealth is one of the rewards needed to spur a person into activity. When the reward is removed, the achievements by individuals and groups of individuals which would benefit everybody will not occur. The Pilgrims tried it, the USSR tried it, and others have tried it throughout history. They are the proof.

20 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Tgrammiex4

Sep-18-13 6:21 AM

D A M N, and here I thought the LTE's were in the OPINION section of the paper.

10 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Garben78

Sep-18-13 7:01 AM

Lol premier Attension we will twy two dew that

2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

eriklatranyi

Sep-18-13 7:32 AM

Mr. Reeder:

You want proof of personal choices?

How about those that choose to remain hooked on drugs?

People choose assistance over work as evidenced it pays more than minimum wage in some areas.

People choose a life of crime over work.

People choose to have sex without any regard for creating a family, just to have fun, then suffer the consequences of their poor choices.

For Mr. Reeder to claim there is no proof that personal choices have nothing to do with poor outcomes demonstrates his total lack of any authenticity, credibility or honesty.

18 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

MrShaman

Sep-18-13 8:16 AM

"The thing about this LTE is that Chuckie does the exact same thing he accuses Phil of. No proof for anything he rails against, just a trail of empty words for the lemmings will follow." - CarlHiller

*

"...a trail of empty words...", followed by (numerous) question-marks...denoting questions ASKED.

Why is it "conservatives" are (typically) so confused by punctuation???

3 Agrees | 14 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

SteelerFan

Sep-18-13 8:49 AM

'Outcomes are not proof but results'

outcomes=results doesn't it?

10 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Shiloht

Sep-18-13 9:01 AM

I actually think the Sun Gazette should shut this whole forum down. That guys letters stem from the vile all of spew in here. The community would be better off without the trash you folks waste your time posting on this forum. You make the entire region look like backward hicks. You're an embarrassment.

4 Agrees | 19 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

enigma

Sep-18-13 9:17 AM

Chuck, What is this weird compulsion you have to refute everything that Phil says? You are like some kind of stalker. It's creepy, not to mention that you always fail miserably. In this case you actually tended to prove what you claimed Phil didn't prove and then claimed that he was wrong. This letter was complete nonsense. You show some signs of being able to think, but then the hate and rage take over and any rational thought goes out the window. Two words, Anger Management.

11 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

gavinf56

Sep-18-13 9:26 AM

Your post is the exception, right Shiloht?

17 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Linhk48

Sep-18-13 9:51 AM

Shame on the Sun-Gazette for continuing to publish this type of personal vendetta drivel.

2 Agrees | 9 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

SpineyRogue

Sep-18-13 10:27 AM

Shiloht --

I personally think that the Sun-Gazette is doing what it should be doing--printing everyone's point of view. Even if most of them are slanted to one side or the other. Everyone should be heard about their opinions, because without these opinions we cannot create healthy dialog to get things done. Right or wrong ideas are what makes this country great and makes exceptional people. Keep it up Sun-Gazette.

9 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Garben78

Sep-18-13 11:04 AM

Eventually dictator Obama has plans to shut this forum down give it time

2 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Shiloht

Sep-18-13 11:51 AM

If you people posted ideas that would be one thing. You post ideological rhetoric without any forethought or insight. I have seen no or very little original thought, but a ton of parroting of ideologues.. Then you insult each other when your opinions differ.

4 Agrees | 11 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

USABorn

Sep-18-13 11:51 AM

eriklatranyi - 7:32 AM

Mr. Reeder:

"You want proof of personal choices?

How about those that choose to remain hooked on drugs?

People choose assistance over work as evidenced it pays more than minimum wage in some areas.

People choose a life of crime over work.

People choose to have sex without any regard for creating a family, just to have fun, then suffer the consequences of their poor choices.

For Mr. Reeder to claim there is no proof that personal choices have nothing to do with poor outcomes demonstrates his total lack of any authenticity, credibility or honesty."

erik......The above would be a perfect LTE, exactly as is, in reply to King Bloviator's LTE full of crap.

10 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Tgrammiex4

Sep-18-13 12:23 PM

Shiloht-"If you people posted ideas that would be one thing. You post ideological rhetoric without any forethought or insight. I have seen no or very little original thought, but a ton of parroting of ideologues.. Then you insult each other when your opinions differ."

You just described the Presidential Debates.....

8 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

VinceKnauff

Sep-18-13 12:27 PM

You make the entire region look like backward hicks. You're an embarrassment.

Shilot - look up the psychological definition of 'projection' and see if it fits your comments here.

Familiarity with reality is confirmation for many if not most of the opinions entered by conservatives here, as well as the contradiction for many if not most of the Liberal opinions entered here.

11 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 25 of 39 comments Show More Comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web