Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Newspaper contacts | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 

A solution

July 16, 2014

Since President Obama has opened the borders, and Nancy Pelosi is happy because in her words soon Texas will blue state, why don't we simply put the thousands of people coming across our border on......

« Back to Article

 
 
sort: oldest | newest

Comments

(220)

USABorn

Jul-19-14 8:51 AM

SilverFeather 7:21 AM

"This means that all of the people waiting at the border (children specifically) must have a court hearing before being automatically deported. Woman please, when you don't check your facts, you make us all look stupid!'

Since Ms Burns didn't even mention the word deported, I think you are the one who should check your facts.

3 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

eriklatranyi

Jul-18-14 5:07 PM

Israel defends itself with the Iron Dome from thousands of Islamic terrorist missiles.

The Iron Dome was developed as part of the Star Wars missile defense program initiated by President Reagan and ridiculed by liberals, defunded, at times by liberals, and never fully supported by liberals.

4 Agrees | 0 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

CMReeder

Jul-18-14 9:33 AM

See!

1 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

gavinf56

Jul-18-14 9:23 AM

No Chuck, it's just your opinion that I don't think is worth spit.

5 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

CMReeder

Jul-18-14 8:43 AM

BTW Scott was just giving his humble opinion.

1 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

CMReeder

Jul-18-14 8:40 AM

"Hey Chuck, do you know what "jmho" stands for? Your desperation to make a valid point is beginning to show."

Yes I do but you see Gavin you told me that my opinion would have my credibility if I gave sources to prove it. Gave examples. You always make claims about the liberals here yet only offer 'jmho'. Which goes to show Gavin that you think a liberal's opinion isn't worth spit.

1 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Capricorn1

Jul-18-14 6:25 AM

In the long run, these discussions have 0 impact on my life. -Gavin

A truer comment couldn't be said.

6 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

gavinf56

Jul-18-14 5:30 AM

"Yes he did, however, we were discussing posts in this order, I believe.--underwood @ 4:23, then Scott36 @ 4:35, then Gavinf56 @ 4:40." - Scott36

I stand corrected.

"You I believe are getting desperate, & attempting to "muddle" the conversation. What is actually funny to me, is that I knew it was going to come to this-LOL!!" - Scott36

Hardly. This is merely some sideshow entertainment for me. I don't take the conversations on this forum too seriously. In the long run, these discussions have 0 impact on my life.

6 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

gavinf56

Jul-18-14 5:23 AM

"Fascinating you gave no specifics, like what was said on those programs that the liberals on Monday repeated verbatim. You like Capricorn1 wanted Scott to do with him." - CMReeder

Hey Chuck, do you know what "jmho" stands for? Your desperation to make a valid point is beginning to show.

5 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Capricorn1

Jul-18-14 2:03 AM

Scott, IMO the bar that has been set regarding Obama and his presidency when it comes to many liberals is "He's better than Bush". Well, that's certainly debatable and IMO that's just not good enough and we certainly deserve better than what we have in the White House and on Capitol Hill.

4 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Capricorn1

Jul-18-14 1:53 AM

Oh and btw Scott, I voted for Obama in 2008. It was one of those lesser of two evils things I thought at the time. I, like many were totally disgusted with current leadership and a senseless war and I, like many wanted "change" and "transparency". The fact is, nothing has changed and I have every right to be dissatisfied with the direction this country is heading and I'm definitely not alone in my thinking and we all can't be Rush Limbaugh robots.

3 Agrees | 1 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Capricorn1

Jul-18-14 1:17 AM

Now to you're childish insults, that to me, indicates that I am hitting close to home, & striking raw nerves. What next, you going to "teach me some respect"? -Scott

LOL Trust me, you don't get under my skin. I don't know you and you certainly don't know me so neither of us are relevant to each other's life. How you feel I insulted you is beyond me. Somehow you are hooked on the notion that anyone that disagrees with this administration policies is a robot parroting talking heads and you and your fellow liberals are the only ones that can think for themselves and have all the answers. Scott, I spent many years in the service and during those years it was unacceptable to have an opinion regarding my CinC. So now it feels good to speak out and voice my objections when warranted and if you think I'm hard on Obama, you should have heard how I felt about Bush when he sent my son in harms way three times to Iraq for no good reason. Exactly who was I parroting then?

3 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

CMReeder

Jul-18-14 1:10 AM

"You know what else is strikingly funny. I like to watch MSNBC on the weekends (I miss Chris Hayes and only get to watch him when nothing else is on int he evenings now), but what I hear coming from the left on these boards, including you, is almost verbatim of what I hear from them on Saturday mornings. I used to laugh because I would here it there on Saturday, and by Monday, I would see it on hear from the left. - jmho - Have a good evening - Gavin "

Fascinating you gave no specifics, like what was said on those programs that the liberals on Monday repeated verbatim. You like Capricorn1 wanted Scott to do with him.

Did you not suggest to me to give proof to my claims to make me more credible to others like you always do. Just being helpful.

2 Agrees | 5 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

CMReeder

Jul-18-14 12:50 AM

"Oh, I forgot, Chuck Reeder needs to go too! An even better deal."

leaningright there is a special place in He ll waiting for you. Enjoy!

Conservatives solve their problems by shipping people out of the country.

3 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

CMReeder

Jul-18-14 12:47 AM

LOVE your post bobbae at 3:41pm. It is all false Saul Alinsky did not author those rules. As a matter of fact that list of rules came out during the communist era. It a list conservatives made up to rile their base and spread their ridiculous talking points. The rules just go to show how cripple in thinking the right really is and how they truly to lie.

3 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

bobbae2

Jul-18-14 12:19 AM

Hmm, I wonder at what time of the day 36IQ dons the tinfoil hat and ingests the chemicals?

1 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Scott36

Jul-17-14 9:52 PM

Ummm actually Phil said this:..-Gavinf56

Yes he did, however, we were discussing posts in this order, I believe.--underwood @ 4:23, then Scott36 @ 4:35, then Gavinf56 @ 4:40. You I believe are getting desperate, & attempting to "muddle" the conversation. What is actually funny to me, is that I knew it was going to come to this-LOL!! Have a Great evening, Like I am!!-Scott

2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Scott36

Jul-17-14 9:39 PM

But Scott is OK with trading one US soldier for five Islamic terrorist masterminds.-eriklatranyi

Actually Erik, I am more concerned about the welfare of Americans, especially those who volunteer to serve this country, aren't you? This is one statement I saw in a very quick search from Fact Check****--I know it will not count, but here it is anyway: "At no point have they been accused of terrorist activities against American civilians or other American non-military targets".-fact check****

I am sure that you can find sources stating that these were the 5 worst people to ever walk the face of the planet, but do you SERIOUSLY believe that this, or any other President would deliberately put the Country at risk?-Do you REALLY Believe that? Might sound good to you, but do you HONESTLY BELIEVE that?-Have a Quiet evening!!-Scott

2 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Scott36

Jul-17-14 9:25 PM

You beat me to it. It doesn’t look as though specifics work for Scott in cases where he doesn’t like the results.-underwood

Mr. Underwood, should you look farther, you will find polls stating the opposite of what you were referring to, Guess those polls don't count--do they? Polls tend to say whatever their clients want them to say. Heck, some polls even had Romney having a chance at winning the last election!-LOL!!How about those "minute" details you were hollering around about, or was that just something that sounded good at the time? But then again, I am not holding my breath. Have a Great, Relaxing Night!!-Scott

3 Agrees | 4 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

gavinf56

Jul-17-14 8:59 PM

"For starters, Mr. Underwood stated polls showed that "the majority of Americans believe the country is moving too far to the left.."- Scott36 time stamp of 5:10 PM

Ummm actually Phil said this:

“Scott, do you suppose the dismal ratings of the President and Congress are a reflection of people’s growing disapproval of the direction Government is taking?” – which you quoted when you replied in your post with a time stamp of 3:28 PM

3 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

eriklatranyi

Jul-17-14 8:22 PM

Scott said:

"No. Security & protection of the Nation & it's people are #1 IMO."

But Scott is OK with trading one US soldier for five Islamic terrorist masterminds.

Hypocrisy.

6 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

gavinf56

Jul-17-14 8:19 PM

...and since they always like to talk about Fox News, You Tube "Prank Caller Destroys MSNBC's 'The Cycle'".

That is some quality journalism right there.

4 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

gavinf56

Jul-17-14 8:18 PM

I have never had any doubts about that Phil.

4 Agrees | 2 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

underwood

Jul-17-14 5:51 PM

Gavin, I was just going to post the same thing you just posted. You beat me to it. It doesn’t look as though specifics work for Scott in cases where he doesn’t like the results.

5 Agrees | 3 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Scott36

Jul-17-14 5:13 PM

You ask to focus on one topic, then, when I do, you say it is too specific.-eriklatranyi

You asked a very specific question(good), I tried to give a very specific answer. How is that confusing to you? Have a Happy, Calm evening!!-Scott

2 Agrees | 7 Disagrees | Report Abuse »

Showing 25 of 220 comments Show More Comments
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web