Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Newspaper contacts | Home RSS
 
 
 
  1. Yes
  2. No
  3. Rename something else for him, such as the entire athletic complex or the field at Beaver Stadium.
  1. A great man who did great things for sports, academia and the development of young men.
  2. A great man who, unfortunately, could not leave his life's when he should have, and as a result made a sad misstep that will forever stain his legacy.
  3. A great man who nonetheless was prone to arrogance, much of it obscured by many achievements, but some of it unseemly to much of the world outside of Penn State.
  1. Fuel oil
  2. Gas
  3. Electric
  4. Coal
  5. Wood pellets
  6. Other
  1. It's a great hire bringing much-needed new blood to the program.
  2. Someone like Tom Bradley or someone else in the Penn State network should have been hired.
  3. It wasn't a great hire but it was the best they could do under the circumstances.
  4. It's a lousy hire of a man with no head coaching experience leading an elite college football program.
  1. An end to all world conflicts and terroristic threats.
  2. A turnaround in our national and world economy.
  3. A united leadership in Washington that is in tune with the problems and solutions needed for regular Americans.
  1. A one-year elimination of the football program.
  2. Scholarship limits for the next three years.
  3. No penalty - this is a criminal matter that doesn't belong under the NCAA's rules.
  1. Celebrating Christ's birth.
  2. Giving and receiving presents.
  3. Being with family and friends.
  1. The movement reflects the discontent most Americans have toward our current economic system and our leadership in Washington in general?
  2. The movement includes young and ambitious people who nevertheless have yet to experience the realities of our economic system.
  3. The movement is made up mostly of self-centered people who are costing taxpayers millions of dollars with pointless protests that are burdening regular working people.
  1. Yes, it's an abomination that they receive annual, automatic pay increases.
  2. No, it sets an objective foundation for the amount of the pay increase.
  1. No. Although shameful, this scandal was isolated to a corner of the school and is not reflective of the school, its football program, students, faculty or leadership.
  2. Yes. I wonder how much more has been swept under the rug and allowed to go on in the past decade.
  3. While I realize this only involved a small percentage of Penn State people, I'm disappointed because I always thought this couldn't happen at this school.
  1. Sadness, that all his good works and achievement were rendered unimportant by a single, monumental mistake of judgment.
  2. Outrage that coach and others allowed such atrocious acts to occur without taking strong action to stop them once they became aware of the problem.
  3. Overwhelming emptiness that the positive image of Penn State and its football program is being dragged through the mud in front of the entire nation.
  4. Bitterness that Coach Paterno is being unjustly villified when he did what he was supposed to - taking the complaint to his superiors.
  1. Yes, it is completely unsafe to use a cell phone with hands while driving.
  2. No, it's not much different than talking with passengers while driving.
  3. It's a good safety idea, but not everybody can afford such devices and some people need a cell phone in their car for emergency purposes.
  1. Not if he does not want to. He's earned the right to determine when he should leave.
  2. Yes, he's well past the time when he met the standards for recruiting, preparation and sideline management necessary to compete on a national level.
  1. Yes. I vote in every election.
  2. No, I've become so discouraged by the poor quality of elected leadership in this country that I can't even get interested in a local election.
  3. I'm not sure, still looking for a compelling reason or candidate to draw me to the polls.
  1. Yes, if it saved money and improved both public safety efficiency and police protection.
  2. No, the best way to protect residents will always be local police protection, no matter the cost.
  3. Not sure, but it would be a better alternative than state police protection should a local force no longer be affordable.
  1. Are merely expressing a viewpoint and frustration of the majority of Americans
  2. Are completely missing the heart of America's economic struggles - President Obama's policies
  3. Have a legitimate point, but tend to ignore that the people they arecriticizing are the same people who hire most of the country's work force.
  1. The city
  2. The city and its neighboring municipalites should share the costs
  3. The federal government
  4. The city, neighboring municipalities and the federal government
  1. Yes
  2. No
  3. I'm not sure because I need to be convinced I can still get stable retirement funding through such an option.
 
 
 
 

 

I am looking for:
in:
News, Blogs & Events Web