Nothing that challenges thesis
In a recent article Dr. Timothy Pagana said: “I would like to challenge Tim Mannello’s statement about the Constitution, the Bible and Christian nationalism.”
The statement I made can be summarized in this way: “The Founding Fathers sought to prevent the establishment of a state religion that could lead to persecution and civil unrest. Their primary concern was to forge a republic with religious freedom, rather than religious uniformity. The United States was not founded as a Christian nation, but rather as a secular republic that guarantees religious freedom to all its citizens.”
Dr. Pagana did not address, much less refute this argument. Instead, he made a lengthy argument that proves Christianity was influential in America’s founding and throughout its history and culture and continues to shape debates about national identity. He makes the case that Christianity has profoundly influenced America’s culture, values, and the founding generation.
I agree. But that has nothing to do with what I wrote. My thesis was about constitutional design and intent: the Founders established a secular republic with religious freedom. Dr. Pagana’s column was about historical influence and heritage: the Founders were influenced by Christian roots and heritage.
As I see it, I agree with the gist, if not some of the research in Dr. Pagana’s article. But the good doctor said nothing that challenges my thesis.
TIM MANNELLO
Williamsport
Submitted by email

