The shadow of press repression is spreading around the world. In the past decade, the number of journalists detained and imprisoned has soared as governments seek tighter control over the media. What started as a crackdown first by dictatorships and then by illiberal democracies is expanding to onetime bastions of civil liberties.

A recent high-profile case is Jimmy Lai, whom authorities in Hong Kong sentenced to 20 years in prison last month. He had campaigned against China’s choking of the territory’s freedoms. Mr. Lai, 78, has already spent five years in a dark cell and is ailing. The sentence effectively condemns him to dying in prison. Mr. Lai has denied all the charges against him.

His plight is increasingly common. At least 330 journalists worldwide were in prison at the end of 2025, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists, up from fewer than 200 a decade ago. More than a third of them were serving sentences of five years or more. Nearly half remained behind bars despite never having been formally sentenced. One-fifth say they were tortured or beaten. An additional 129 members of the press died while doing their jobs or because of them, the highest number since records began in 1992. Among the worst offenders against press freedom have been China, Russia, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Israel, Myanmar, Sudan and Turkey.

These courageous journalists have sought to shine a light on the world around them. They ask questions that political leaders do not want to answer and publish information that leaders do not want the public to know. For their efforts, they have been falsely accused of being enemies of the state, terrorists, foreign agents or spies.

Examples from around the globe abound, but even in the United States, home of the First Amendment and a longtime beacon of free speech, the media is being squeezed. Again and again, the Trump administration has tried to intimidate journalists who do not toe its line. It has issued rules requiring journalists covering the Pentagon to report only officially approved information. It has searched the home of a Washington Post reporter and arrested reporters covering an immigration protest in Minnesota. It has used the government’s regulatory power in an attempt to chill critical coverage and reward media companies that cozy up to the administration. Mr. Trump has filed dubious lawsuits against The New York Times, ABC News, CNN, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post and the owner of CBS News.

He has done more to violate the First Amendment and to restrict a free press than any modern president, even Richard Nixon.

Democrats have rightly criticized the Trump administration’s behavior. But standing up for press freedom also means resisting the temptation to adopt similar tactics. We note with concern the tactics of Representative Jasmine Crockett of Texas. Ms. Crockett reportedly ousted a reporter for The Atlantic from a campaign rally last month and then lied about the reporter, saying, “She has a history of being less than truthful.” Ms. Crockett also called the Capitol Police on a CNN reporter earlier in February. Ms. Crockett lost the Democratic Senate primary in her state on Tuesday.

The goal of leaders who try to muzzle the media is plain enough. They want to snuff out the truth and establish a monopoly on information. They want only news that flatters the government.

Most worrisome, attacks on the media can feed on themselves. When a government jails or harasses some journalists, others may fear the consequences of courageous reporting. The fewer free voices there are to call out tyrants, the easier it is for them to steal and repress. This last point is crucial. The consequences of media suppression are ultimately tangible. A society without a free press is one in which the government is likely to do a poorer job of providing its citizens with decent lives and instead to become a corrupt self-enrichment machine for elites.

The best protection for the many journalists who continue to report honestly and bravely — as well as for those unfairly imprisoned — is the world’s attention. By trying to silence journalists, autocrats and aspiring autocrats hope to make the world ignore what they are doing. The rest of us should refuse to do so. We stand with Mr. Lai, Mr. Phara, Mr. Sopheap, Mr. Sophal, Mr. Nguer and the many other reporters who fight for the truth around the world, and at home.

— New York Times